Applications of Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Biotechnology and Food Preservation: A Bibliometric Review



Due to the growing prevalence of antibiotic resistance in microorganisms and the demand for safe food, there is increasing interest in using natural bioproducts such as the antimicrobial peptides bacteriocins to extend the shelf-life of foods. This is because of their spectrum of activity, ease of synthesis and applicability. This study reports on the global trends in lactic acid bacteria (LAB) bacteriocins based research publications in the Web of Science core collections within the last 20 years (2000-2019), with specific focus to their applications in biotechnology and food science.


Data analysis was undertaken using VOSviewer and HistCite software to evaluate relationships between articles and visualise research linkages amongst authors, institutions and countries.


In the 20 years under review, a total of 1741 bacteriocin related articles were published, with the most cited publication examining the anti-infective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius. The highest research output was recorded by the United States, followed by Spain and China. However, Europe as a continent had the highest research output with a higher inter-institution collaboration network and stronger food safety legislations.


The bibliometric analysis gave insights into the research areas, cooperation network of authors, co-citation maps and co-occurrence of keywords utilized in the research field and indicates that bacteriocin-based research is highly multidisciplinary with a global reach.


Key focus is on the control of foodborne disease pathogens, search for new producer organisms and approaches to improve bacteriocin yield and application. This class of antimicrobial peptides has the potential to replace chemical food preservatives in the future.

Keywords: Bacteriocin, Lactic acid bacteria, Bibliometric analysis, HistCite, VOSviewer, Food safety, Food security.


There has been a rising trend in the clinical occurrence of drug-resistant microbes in recent times, leading to a high rate of hospitalisations with attendant loss in productivity and associated economic costs [1]. This shows the inadequacies of current prophylactic and therapeutic approaches for microbial disease control. Similarly, there have been growing incidences of foodborne illnesses due to microbial contamination [2], especially in ready-to-eat foods. This increase in microbial resistance to current antimicrobials and the need for safer foods has led research towards alternative antimicrobial agents for food, medical and varied purposes. Within the food safety and food chain system, antimicrobial agents and organic chemicals are employed for food preservation, shelf life extension, and the prevention of food spoilage and foodborne illnesses. However, in recent times, consumers have been increasingly demanding minimally processed food products, free from chemical preservatives yet microbiologically safe [3]. Chemical preservatives used in foods may have adverse health effects. An approach to reduce chemical preservatives and mitigate adverse effects associated with them is the use of natural food preservatives. One of such agents is bacteriocins, which are antimicrobial peptides, ribosomally synthesised by a diverse range of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) which have either bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects on bacterial strains closely related to the producers but which do not negatively affect the producer organisms themselves [4, 5]. Bacteriocin production is an adaptation mechanism employed by bacteria in an environment of limited nutrients to aid competition, thus ensuring survivability. Apart from lactic acid bacteria, numerous bacteria genera can produce at least one bacteriocin, although not all have been identified [6]. Bacteriocins have been known by different terminologies, including antimicrobial peptides, antimicrobial proteins [7], bioactive peptides [8], and antimicrobial activity (AMA) peptides [9], amongst others. They are of great interest, especially with regard to food preservation, because of their spectrum of activity and the ease of digestion by the human gastrointestinal tract, thus ensuring that they do not get into the systemic circulation [10].

Bacteriocins have diverse applications as biopreservatives [11]. They can be applied as additives in food either in the crude or purified form by incorporating fermentates of a bacteriocinogenic strain [12]. Furthermore, they can be employed in active packaging of food (such as incorporation into the packaging material for slow release) to extend shelf-life [13] or by the addition of pelleted bacteriocins in semi-permeable sachet into a packaged food which will be slowly released into the food environment throughout the storage period [14]. Unlike antibiotics which are secondary metabolites, bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesised. Thus, they are liable to breakdown by proteases and other proteolytic enzymes [4], making them harmless for human consumption as gastric enzymes in the stomach easily degrade them. Several bacteriocins, including subtilin, cerein, thuricin, and plantaricin, have been characterised and purified for commercial testing, but the most widely utilised is nisin. Nisin is generally regarded as safe and has application as a natural preservative in foods of various origins [15, 16]. A variety of classification schemes have been proposed and applied for bacteriocins. These classifications of bacteriocins are based on the producing bacteria strain, molecular weight, chemical composition or mechanism of action of the bacteriocins. Bacteriocins are generally divided into four groups; Class I bacteriocins contain the uncommon amino acid lanthionine, and class II bacteriocins are small unmodified peptides with molecular sizes less than 10kDa, while class III bacteriocins have molecular weights of more than 10kDA. The class IV bacteriocins, currently termed bacteriolysins are large complexes consisting of carbohydrate and lipid moieties [17].

The bibliometric analysis explores the characteristics of a given set of data by employing mathematical and statistical methods to observe distribution, co-relationships and patterns in the database [18, 19]. The use of bibliometric analysis allows for a better understanding of research trends on a particular topic at a holistic level against a micro-level [20], thus allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the current research direction. This analytical method can be utilized in various disciplines and research topics. It has been used in studies as diverse as Energy performance [21], foodborne diseases [22], and microbiology [23], amongst others. Bibliometric analysis is important as it measures the trend, diversity, productivity and impact of publications in the scientific community and can guide research in the right direction. This is essentially true due to bacteriocins' commercial importance with regards to applications in food preservation, protecting against food poisoning bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes [24], and their potential to replace antibiotics as agents of choice in the treatment of infections. Furthermore, the increasing consumer demand for microbiologically safe food, free of chemical additives [3], whilst maintaining the organoleptic properties of the food can be met by bacteriocins.

Directed analysis of researchers, institutes and countries undertaking leading research on bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was conducted, allowing the evaluation of collaboration and network strengths between individuals and institutes. Also, the geographical distribution and linkages of published literature on LAB bacteriocins were evaluated. With this bibliometric analysis, gaps in bacteriocin-based research have been identified, and future research perspectives have been discussed. In addition, this article has highlighted the growing field of enquiry and provided insight into the multidisciplinary nature of LAB bacteriocin-based research as well as their applications in biotechnology and food science, providing information for food handling organisations and informing the selection of funding agencies and journals to publish for researchers.


A database was generated for this study by searching the Thomson Reuters Web of Science (WoS) core collection database on November 26, 2020, with the addition of newer publications. The Web of Science was chosen because of its accessibility and wider coverage [25, 26] and taking advantage of the inherent inclination of this search engine to English language publications in the natural sciences and engineering [27]. Furthermore, WoS includes a full index of all authors associated with a paper, institutional addresses and bibliographic references of each article, thus allowing for easy analysis with an interdisciplinary coverage [28]. A focused terminology search was performed on WoS core collection using the keywords: (bacteriocin OR “bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria” OR “lantibiotics”) on the basic search tab, selecting the “Title” option, which allowed an extensive search of publications with the selected keywords in the title only, thus retrieving articles directly involved in bacteriocin research. The Boolean operator (" ") was used to obtain results matching the exact keywords as written in the search box without alterations. These search criteria were utilized to build a comprehensive database for LAB bacteriocin-based research. A 20-year range was applied between 2000 and 2019. This year range was chosen to represent current research trends in the field, allowing for a wider view of how research focus has shifted within this period. Furthermore, very few articles were published before the year 2000 and these publications may have become obsolete due to advances in the research area and new information. The database obtained was filtered/refined to select only research journal articles. This is because they are considered to be original research activities which can be used to infer technological improvements and analytical skillsets being employed in bacteriocin based research. Similarly, non-English language articles were excluded. The selected articles were preliminarily classified using WoS analytical tools before being imported. They were indexed into Clarivates HistCite (12.03.17) software for collation and then into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for vetting. Vetting was undertaken by individually reviewing the paper title, publishing journal, author names and affiliations to avoid repetition and ensure they were bacteriocin related. When duplications occurred, they were manually deleted. The obtained data were classified based on year of publication, country of origin, citations, author affiliations and funding agencies.

Vosviewer software (1.6.13) [29] was employed to visualize and analyse the bibliometric networks to gain an in-depth view of research trends. Different maps were created, and these include; co-authorship maps to show the level of collaboration amongst experts in the field, co-citation maps showing the journal articles that were most cited together and keyword co-occurrence maps which gives an idea of keywords mainly used in bacteriocin research and are very important to inform future researchers when retrieving published resources. Author affiliation and country maps show which institutions and countries are at the forefront of bacteriocin research. Vosviewer was chosen as the analysis software because of its inherent ability to link research by various parameters such as country, journals, institutions, authors etc., grouping them into clusters while providing link strength and connections of the papers. In addition, an overlay visualization is possible showing the activities during the period of study. Fig. (1) Presents a flowchart utilized for dataset retrieval and analysis.


Using the defined search criteria of (“bacteriocin” OR “bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria” OR “lantibiotics”) and refining this further to research articles published in English language only, a database was generated with 1,741 articles written by 4892 authors in 414 journals with a total of 26,954 cited references and 5060 keywords within the 20 years evaluated (2000-2019).

3.1. Yearly Distribution and Research Output

Within the 20 years of analysis, there was a steady increase in the research output in the later years, compared to the year 2000, with a spike recorded in 2012 and 2015. The year 2012 had the highest research output at 124 publications, while the lowest was recorded in 2001 with a total of 55 publications. This trend in the publication is given in Fig. (2).

Fig. (1). Data retrieval and analysis flowchart.
Fig. (2). Number of publications and citations per year for bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.

The bacteriocin research field is a fast-growing one with almost a doubling in the total research output in the 20 years of study, as shown in Fig. 2. This can be attributed to increased awareness of bacteriocins, public perception/acceptance and the approval of bacteriocins for commercial usage. Specifically, this growth can be linked to the authorization of the bacteriocin Nisin in the EU as a food additive under Annex II of EC Regulation 1333/2008 which permitted its use in various food categories after evaluation of its safety in 2006 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food [30]. Furthermore, this period coincides with a rise in antimicrobial resistance to commonly used antibiotics, especially in farm animals. This increase in antimicrobial resistance can result in the development of zoonotic diseases as antibiotic-resistant bacteria of animal origin have been shown to persist in meats and other foods of animal origin in retail outlets, causing subclinical colonization of the gastrointestinal tract of man, systemic circulation and clinical infections [31]. It can also be inferred that the constant increase in the number of papers published per year shows the potential for growth in the research area, highlighting the commercial viability of bacteriocins and their biotechnological applications in the food and pharmaceutical sectors [32]. Furthermore, there are vast areas of enquiry on bacteriocin research which has not been exploited, including the use of cutting-edge bioengineering tools to aid in their discovery as they are gene-encoded and ribosomally synthesised [33], which can lead to the production of diverse bacteriocins with improved specificity and activity tailored to specific applications [34]. These vast research gaps drive the increase in yearly research output. On the hand, there was a continual gradual decline in the number of citations averaged per year. This decline in citation does not mean a decline in research intensity as newer publications tend to have lower citations than older articles.

LAB bacteriocin research in the years of study was mainly related to the following areas:

  • Microbiology
  • Biotechnology and applied microbiology
  • Food science and technology
  • Biochemistry and molecular biology

Because of the interdisciplinary nature of the research involved and the application of bacteriocins in various fields, there were overlaps in the categorization of articles; thus, some articles belonged to more than one category. Of all the published articles, 840 were published under the microbiology category, accounting for 48.2% of total publications. Microbiology is expected to be top on the list because bacteriocins are microbial products, and most research is geared towards synthesizing new bacteriocins from microorganisms. Also, among the top category is; biotechnology applied microbiology with 632 publications and food science technology with 452 publications, highlighting that research is focused on the biotechnological application of bacteriocins and their potential use in food science for the biopreservation of food products. The treemap (Fig. 3) provides a visualization of the top 10 categories of research as grouped by the web of science database.

Fig. (3). Tree-map representing research categories of bacteriocin-related publications between 2000 and 2019.

3.2. Research Output by Country/Region

The country of origin of each article can be deduced using the first author's address and affiliation. The collated database shows that publications on bacteriocin research have emanated from 79 countries, representing about a third of the countries in the world. While this represents a wide geographical spread, only 15 of these countries have a minimum of 50 publications, responsible for 82% (1428) of total publications. In these top 15 countries, there are three countries from North America, seven from Europe, four from Asia and one from Africa. All listed countries belong to the top world economies within their regions. The highest number of publications was recorded by the United States of America (165), followed by Spain (151) and the People’s Republic of China (145), indicating that these countries are leading the research in bacteriocins and antimicrobial peptides. Amongst all the countries, the highest citation was recorded by the United States of America (4654), followed by Spain (4723) and Norway (2735). The country data on published literature on bacteriocins are presented in Table 1. The table highlights the total papers, total citations in published literature and average citations per publication for the 15 countries with more than 50 publications.

Table 1.
Research Output on bacteriocin-related research by country between 2000 and 2019.
S/N Country Total Publications % Total Citation Average Citation per Publication Most cited
1 USA 165 9.48 4654 28.21 [35]
2 Spain 151 8.67 4723 31.28 [36]
3 Peoples Republic of China 145 8.33 2248 15.50 [37]
4 India 126 7.24 1343 10.66 [38]
5 Brazil 116 6.66 2165 18.66 [39]
6 Japan 105 6.03 2073 19.74 [40]
7 France 94 5.40 2350 25.00 [41]
8 South Korea 91 5.23 1437 15.79 [42]
9 Norway 78 4.48 2735 35.06 [43]
10 Canada 68 3.91 2003 29.46 [44]
11 Italy 66 3.79 1654 25.06 [45]
12 Germany 61 3.50 1921 31.49 [46]
13 Belgium 57 3.27 1651 28.96 [47]
14 Ireland 55 3.16 2433 44.24 [48]
15 South Africa 50 2.87 2063 41.26 [49]

The United States of America had both the highest number of published articles and the highest citations, followed by Spain. This is consistent with research trends in antibiotics and drug resistance [50]. Although the United States of America recorded the highest publication and citations, the country with the highest average citation per paper was the Republic of Ireland, thus indicating that the articles published in the country had the most significant impact within the field, followed by South Africa. With regards to the application of bacteriocin-based research, the United States of America is leading. In the USA, nisin, a Type A (1) lantibiotic, was the first bacteriocin to receive FDA approval as a generally regarded as safe compound (GRAS) for food preservation purposes [51] and has been efficacious because of its wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Furthermore, the compound has an immunomodulatory function that can activate the adaptive immune response and cancer prevention is being applied medically for therapeutical purposes [51]. Conversely, countries with the least number of publications (1) include; Barbados, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Cuba, Cyprus, Latvia, Mongolia, Qatar, Republic of Congo, Senegal, Sudan and Zimbabwe.

Categorization of all countries based on continent reveals that Europe had the highest participation at 39.24% (31), followed by Asia at 26.58% (21), Africa at 16.45% (13), South America at 8.86% (7), North America at 6.32% (5) and Australia 2.53% (2). This continental distribution is displayed in Fig. 4. The higher participation of European nations in bacteriocin-based research can be attributed to the emphasis of the European Food Safety Agency on regulating the amount and type of food additives in foods, thus necessitating the need for alternative approaches to food preservation free from chemical additives as exemplified in commission regulation (EU) No 1129/2011 which set out limits for food additives, much lower than acceptable limits in other countries [52].

A visualization of the linkages between the 15 countries with 50 publications and above is presented in Fig. 5. The country nodes' size indicates the country's contribution level (number of publications). Similarly, lines linking the partnering countries and the thickness represent the strength of such partnerships. These indicators can measure the network strength, co-authorships and co-citations between two country nodes [29]. The visualization shows 105 linkages between the countries. These countries are grouped into two (green and red) clusters based on their collaboration and contribution to article publication. The clusters are differentiated by colours, with countries in the same cluster more strongly linked and connected. Furthermore, the number of papers published in a country can be represented by the size of the circle. Most European nations (Spain, Germany, Ireland, and Norway) belong in cluster 2 (green) with the USA and Canada. This shows a strong regional collaboration amongst the European nations in bacteriocin research. The United States of America has the highest total link strength, collaborating in 167 documents with all the countries. This can be attributed to the number of participatory institutions in this country. This was followed by Spain, which collaborated on 151 documents spread among all the countries. All the featured countries have 14 links, meaning there were collaborations with all listed countries. Spain and Norway recorded the strongest collaboration between the two countries. This analysis shows that bacteriocin-based research is multinational and cuts across geographical regions with collaboration between authors and institutions in different countries and continents.

Fig. (4). Number of publications by continent on bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.
Fig. (5). Network visualization of bibliographic coupling (collaboration) amongst countries with a minimum of 50 publications in bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.

3.3. Research Output by Institutions

A total of 1391 institutions contributed to bacteriocin-related research as collated on the database. The research output by institutions indicates that the highest paper publications were by authors from the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil (50), followed by the University of Stellenbosch (49), The Spanish National Research Council (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC) (34 publications) and Kyushu University with 32 publications (Fig. 6). It is of note that although the United States of America had the highest total number of publications and citations, no institution individually from that country featured in the first 10 rankings, thus pointing out that the high output may be related to the large numbers of institutions within the country, GDP and funding available for research [53]. In total, 17 institutions had 20 publications or above, representing 27.68% of the total research output. This information is depicted in Fig. (6).

Among the 17 universities with 20 publications or above, Norway had the highest number of representing universities (3), followed by Japan and the Republic of Ireland with 2 representing institutions. Although the University of Sao Paulo had the highest research output at 50, the University of Stellenbosch, with 49 papers, had a higher number of citations (2039) compared to the 833 recorded by the University of Sao Paulo, thus confirming that this university is the leading institute in bacteriocin based research with respect to citation and visibility of publications. Similarly, the National University of Ireland, with only 25 publications, had a very high number of citations (1533), highlighting that an institution's impact on the research field is not solely dependent on the number of publications. The analysis further indicated that Europe is the hotbed of bacteriocin research as 11 of the 17 top publishing institutions are European.

The bibliographic coupling of the selected literature to evaluate the strength of partnerships between institutions with over 20 publications is shown in Fig. (7). Each node on the figure denotes an institution, while the colours represent different clusters. The institutions are grouped into two clusters. Institutions in the same cluster are more connected in their research collaboration and output than those from other clusters. However, it is interesting to note that all the top 17 institutions listed were strongly linked. The strongest linkage is between the University of Stellenbosch and the University of Sao Paulo in the green cluster, the two universities with the highest number of publications. This is followed by the University of Oslo and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences in the red cluster. The strong linkage between the University of Oslo and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences may be because they are from the same country; thus, research collaboration is more natural.

Fig. 6. Number of Publications by institutions on bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.

3.4. Research Output by Authors

Analysis of publications and citations by authors enables the mapping of co-author relationships, which helps identify the most productive individuals within the field and their affiliations. A total of 4892 authors were involved in bacteriocin-based research in the period under review. There were 14 authors with 20 or more publications to their name. The highest number of publications was by Todorov, S.D. of the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil, with 56 publications and 1642 citations in the Web of Science database (Table 2) with key research focus on the screening of bacteriocin producers, characterisation of produced bacteriocins and their application in inhibiting bacteria foodborne pathogens. The next author with a high citation score is Dicks, L.MT. of the University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, with 42 publications and 1702 citations. The highest citation score of 1721 citations was recorded by Nes, I.F. of the Agricultural University of Norway, the third-highest published author with 38 publications. The high citation score of his publications shows the overarching importance and relevance of the studies in bacteriocin research, indicating that he is the most visible author in bacteriocin-based research. This author's works mainly revolve around the production of bacteriocins by different bacteria genera and exploring the genetic/molecular basis of their productions. Although the number of citations a manuscript or an author receives does not always correlate with impact, it shows the visibility of the article and its influence within the research sphere.

Fig. (7). Bibliographic coupling of bacteriocin-based research publications by institutions with a minimum of 20 research articles.
Table 2.
Author contribution to bacteriocin-related publications between 2000 and 2019.
S/N Author Publications Percent (%) Citations
1 Todorov SD 56 3.22 1642
2 Dicks LMT 42 2.41 1702
3 Nes IF 38 2.18 1721
4 Sonomoto K 32 1.84 827
5 Hill C 31 1.78 1486
6 Zendo T 31 1.78 815
7 Diep DB 30 1.72 729
8 De Vuyst L 28 1.61 1204
9 Ross RP 28 1.61 961
10 Hernandez PE 27 1.55 733
11 Cintas LM 24 1.38 680
12 Herranz C 23 1.32 668
13 Brandelli A 20 1.15 820
14 Nakayama J 20 1.15 629

Fig. 8. presents a network visualisation of authors who have been cited together. The co-citation of two different authors by a single publication indicates the relatedness of the authors' published work and impact. This is a straightforward approach to establishing connections between authors [54]. For simplicity of data analysis, this was limited to the visualization of authors with a minimum of 100 citations and are cited together in at least 1 published article.

The VOSviewer analysis shows that only 48 authors met the criteria. The authors were grouped into three clusters (red, green and blue). Todorov, S.D. was the highest co-cited author in the green cluster with 640 citations. The highest co-cited author in the red cluster was Cotter, P.D., with 436 citations, while the highest co-cited author in the blue cluster was Citas, L.M. The pairing of authors with the strongest co-citation strength revealed that Todorov, S.D. (Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil) and Klaenhammer, T.R. (North Carolina State University, USA) had the strongest co-citation strength, followed by Todorov, S.D. and Parente, E (University of Basilicata, Italy).

Fig. (8). Network visualization of co-citation of authors with a minimum of 100 citations in bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.

3.5. Co-occurrence of Keywords

Co-occurrence of keywords used by authors indicates the relevance of these keywords in describing and retrieving research articles on bacteriocins. A total of 5060 keywords were used; 24 occurred a minimum of 100 times. The most encountered keywords are “Bacteriocin” (666), “Lactic-acid bacteria” (541), “Purification” (439), “Nisin” (261) and “Listeria monocytogenes” (214). The spread of the keywords indicates that the most prevalent focus of bacteriocin research is the identification of producer strains, their source, type of bacteriocin, characterization and application of produced bacteriocins. Analysis of the co-occurrence of keywords that have occurred a minimum of 60 times groups the keywords into three clusters (green, red and blue), as seen in Fig. 9. The number of times a keyword appears is calculated as its link strength and indicates the relevance of such keyword within the research domain under evaluation. The blue cluster is focused on the antimicrobial activity of bacteriocins, their production and purification. Within this cluster, the predominant keyword is “bacteriocin,” which has a total link strength of 2151 and co-occurred most frequently with lactic-acid bacteria (link strength = 233). This is followed by bacteriocin and purification (Link strength = 218) and lactic acid bacteria with purification (link strength = 172). The green cluster focused more on the bacteriocin-producing strains, pathogens and types of bacteriocin. Within this cluster, the predominant keyword is “Nisin,” which has a total link strength of 261 and co-occurred most frequently within the cluster with “Listeria monocytogenes” (Link strength = 50) and “Inhibition” (Link strength = 42). The red cluster deals more with the characterization and properties of bacteriocins, with the most prevalent keyword being “Identification” with a total link strength of 780, co-occurring most frequently within the cluster with “Biosynthesis” (Link strength = 23) and “Immunity” (Link strength = 22).

Keyword analysis of bacteria species indicates the highest co-occurring bacterial keyword was Listeria monocytogenes which has a total link strength of 864 in 42 links. It is strongly connected to the bacteriocin nisin, indicating that research focuses mainly on this pathogen in food and food products and its inhibition using nisin. Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive foodborne pathogen that causes gastroenteritis, abortion, and meningitis and is associated with epidemic listeriosis [55]. Therefore, its inhibition is vital due to the rising pattern of resistance to multiple antibiotics previously effective in its control [56]. Similarly, several correlations were seen between bacteriocin and bacteriocin-producing organisms, including “Lactococcus lactis” (Link strength = 46) and “Lactobacillus plantarum” (Link strength =39). Lactobacillus plantarum is a common bacteria in food and can be present in various sources, including fruits, dairy products, vegetables and cereals [57]. They produce various class IIb bacteriocins called plantaricin, which has application in food quality control, especially regarding inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes.

Fig. (9). Co-occurrence of keywords used a minimum of 60 times in bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.

3.6. Research Output by Journals

A total of 414 journals were involved in bacteriocin-based research publications. The prevalent journal for bacteriocin bacteriocin-based research publication in Applied and Environmental Microbiology has 120 publications and a total citation of 4471. This is followed by the Journal of Applied Microbiology, with 74 publications and 2638 citations. The 414 journals which published a total of 1741 publications indicate an average of 4.20 papers per journal. Of the journals, 4 (Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Applied Microbiology, Food Control and International Journal of Food Microbiology) had more than 50 publications. Overall, a total of 26 journals had a minimum of 15 publications and is presented in Table 3. The majority of the top publishing journals have a high impact factor, as seen from the table, which is an important index for the measurement of the significance of a journal [58].

Table 3.
Publications on bacteriocin-related research by Journal house between 2000 and 2019.
S/N Journal Impact Factor Publications Citation Average Citation
1 Applied and Environmental Microbiology 4.077 120 4471 37.258
2 Journal of Applied Microbiology 2.683 74 2638 35.649
3 International Journal of Food Microbiology 4.006 58 3178 54.793
4 Food Control 4.248 58 1427 24.603
5 Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins 2.962 37 301 8.135
6 Journal of Bacteriology 3.234 33 1248 37.818
7 Letters in Applied Microbiology 1.805 31 853 27.516
8 Food Microbiology 4.089 28 1044 37.286
9 Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 1.975 27 320 11.852
10 Microbiology-SGM 1.922 27 1283 47.519
11 FEMS Microbiology Letters 1.994 26 661 25.423
12 Journal of Food Protection 1.559 24 523 21.792
13 Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 4.715 23 846 36.783
14 World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 2.652 23 323 14.043
15 Current Microbiology 1.595 19 396 20.842
16 African Journal of Microbiology Research 0.539 18 104 5.778
17 Annals of Microbiology 1.431 18 117 6.500
18 BMC Microbiology 3.287 18 584 32.444
19 Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2.857 18 316 17.556
20 Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2.14 17 244 14.353
21 Frontiers in Microbiology 4.259 17 77 4.529
22 Scientific Reports 4.011 17 221 13.000
23 Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 3.67 16 445 27.813
24 LWT-Food Science and Technology 3.714 16 226 14.125
25 Molecular Microbiology 3.649 15 831 55.400
26 PLOS One 2.776 15 342 22.800
Fig. (10). Bibliographic coupling with relation to publications sources with a minimum of 15 articles in bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.

The visualisation of the 26 journals with more than 15 publications is shown in Fig. (10). It highlights the co-citation association of articles published within them. As indicated in Table 3, Applied and Environmental Biology have the strongest total link strength, with connections to all the top papers. This is closely followed by the Journal of Applied Microbiology and the International Journal of Food Microbiology. The strongest link was between the Journal of applied microbiology and the Applied and environmental Biology journal, and the International Journal of Food Microbiology and Applied and Environmental microbiology. The visualization shows that these three journals are the leading sources of information on bacteriocin-based research, and articles published within these journals are closely related. This is expected as the scope of these journals is in applied microbiology research, a niche for bacteriocin-based research. Similarly, the International Journal of Food Microbiology has amongst its focus subjects related to food preservation and shelf life elongation, which is the thrust of most bacteriocin-based research.

In terms of citation, the top 26 journals identified (6.28%) out of a total of 414 journals had 23019 (60.75%) of the total 37,887 citations. This shows the high impact and contribution of these journals to the research field. Although Applied and Environmental Microbiology has the highest number of publications and citations, the International Journal of Food Microbiology had the highest average citation of 54.793, thus, showing that bacteriocin research articles published in it are highly cited (Table 3).

Table 4.
Highest cited articles in bacteriocin-related research between 2000 and 2019.
S/N Author Title Citation Journal Year Citation Intensity Refs
1 Corr SC, Li Y, Riedel CU, O'Toole PW, Hill C, et al. Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the anti-infective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118 464 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 2007 4.33 [48]
2 Leverentz B, Conway WS, Camp MJ, Janisiewicz WJ, Abuladze T, et al. Biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut produce by treatment with lytic bacteriophages and a bacteriocin 249 Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2003 8.04 [35]
3 Rea MC, Sit CS, Clayton E, O'Connor PM, Whittal RM, et al. Thuricin CD, a posttranslationally modified bacteriocin with a narrow spectrum of activity against Clostridium difficile 248 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 2010 8.10 [44]
4 Aasen IM, Moretro T, Katla T, Axelsson L, Storro I Influence of complex nutrients, temperature and pH on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus sakei CCUG 42687 192 Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2000 10.42 [43]
5 Li C, Bai JH, Cai ZL, Fan OY Optimization of a cultural medium for bacteriocin production by Lactococcus lactis using response surface methodology 181 Journal of Biotechnology 2002 11.06 [37]
6 Cintas LM, Casaus P, Herranz C, Havarstein LS, Holo H, et al. Biochemical and genetic evidence that Enterococcus faecium L50 produces enterocins L50A and L50B, the sec-dependent enterocin P, and a novel bacteriocin secreted without an N-terminal extension termed enterocin Q 177 Journal of Bacteriology 2000 11.30 [36]
7 Flynn S, van Sinderen D, Thornton GM, Holo H, Nes IF, et al. Characterization of the genetic locus responsible for the production of ABP-118, a novel bacteriocin produced by the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus salivarius subsp salivarius UCC118 169 Microbiology-SGM 2002 11.85 [60]
8 van der Ploeg JR Regulation of bacteriocin production in Streptococcus muttans by the quorum-sensing system required for the development of genetic competence 155 Journal of Bacteriology 2005 12.94 [61]
9 Stern NJ, Svetoch EA, Eruslanov BV, Perelygin VV, Mitsevich EV, et al. Isolation of a Lactobacillus salivarius strain and purification of its bacteriocin, which is inhibitory to Campylobacter jejuni in the chicken gastrointestinal system 155 Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2006 12.94 [62]
10 Kommineni S, Bretl DJ, Lam V, Chakraborty R, Hayward M, et al. Bacteriocin production augments niche competition by enterococci in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract 151 Nature 2015 13.34 [63]

3.7. Highest Cited Articles

A search for the most prominent publications showed that 10 papers had citations above 150. These are highlighted in Table 4. The most impactful article in bacteriocin research is “Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the anti-infective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118” [48], with 464 citations which focused on the ability of a newly isolated lactic acid bacteria to produce bacteriocins which can inhibit the activity of the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes and investigated the mechanism of this anti-infective activity. Whereas the next highly cited paper investigated the biocontrol of Listeria monocytogens using a bacteriophage and nisin [35]. Notably, most of the highly cited papers are from earlier years. This shows the foundational nature of these initial researches and the key roles in contributing to the emerging field of bacteriocin research. With regards to the citation count of a paper, the time effect is an important parameter to be considered [59]. This is because the older a paper is, the more likely it will be cited. Thus, the citation intensity indicates a paper's performance in relation to the number of years since its publication. The citation intensity score shows that although the highest cited paper is Corr et al., [48]. the article with the highest number of citations per year is Kommineni et al., [63], which demonstrated that bacteriocin production by commensal microorganisms in the intestines can affect gut microbiota and can be employed as a therapeutic approach for the elimination of multi-drug resistant bacteria. The citation intensity of this article underscores its high visibility and usage within the field and the key effect the number of years post-publication has on the number of citations an article receives.

The top-cited papers were published in predominantly two journals; The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America and The Journal of Bacteriology.


In addition to the major applications of bacteriocins in food preservation to reduce incidences of food spoilage and foodborne illnesses, a variety of medical advancements and applications of bacteriocin have been demonstrated recently. The bacteriocins nisin and fermenticin are spermicidal and decrease sperm motility (in rabbits), with the potential for use as birth control agents [64, 65]. However, the concentration of bacteriocin, which is effective in inhibiting spermatozoa in rabbits, may negatively affect the normal flora of the human vagina [66], and thus studies to modify the bacteriocins to be effective as a birth control agent must factor in its spectrum of activity and potential to destabilise the microbiota of humans. Similarly, the bacteriocins nisin is effective in inhibiting Streptococcus mutans which is implicated in cases of dental caries. A study has shown that a formulation of nisin and polylysine is effective in completely eradicating Streptococcus mutans in the oral cavity of individuals [67], showing their potential use in the prevention of dental caries and halitosis when incorporated into dental care products. Other potential applications include their use as anti-cancer agents. The nisin variant (Nisin ZP) showed in-vivo and in-vitro activity by inducing apoptosis in HNSCC cells and further resulted in a reduction in cell proliferation [68] highlighting the promising nature of this agent for the treatment of cancers.

With the global increase in microbial resistance to conventional antibiotics, the ability to effectively control pathogens and undesirable microorganisms continue to dwindle. It is estimated that by 2050, this will lead to more than 10 million deaths annually, with a financial burden of up to 100 billion USD [69]. Thus, there is a need for an effective replacement for antibiotics. Bacteriocins are a promising alternative, and their research should focus more on the engineering of more stable forms that can be applied freely for food preservation and medical uses. Furthermore, genetic engineering, the application of proteomics and metabolomics techniques which results in a rapid advance in the process development for bacteriocin production at the industrial scale, needs to be given more attention. Hence, greater emphasis on collaboration between research institutes/universities, companies and government agencies to encourage the development of this promising line of research is needed. These collaborations have been evidenced in this bibliometric analysis between research institutes. However, for effective product development, collaborations should not be limited to research institutes or universities but between funding bodies, start-up ventures and government policymakers. The future of bacteriocin application may be found in nanotechnology and microencapsulation for the slow release of an antimicrobial particle within food products or food packaging materials. This is because antimicrobial peptides such as bacteriocins can be rapidly inactivated in food matrixes through binding to proteins and lipids. Furthermore, they can be degraded by proteolytic enzymes in foods, thus reducing their efficacy [70]. Therefore, to maintain their stability, microencapsulation and slow-release systems for bacteriocins need to be further explored for effective food utilization for a shelf-life extension. The currently published literature has not fully explored these areas of research; thus, future perspectives may be directed towards addressing concerns on the practical long-term application of bacteriocins, especially in foods and the process industries.


The research focused on the antimicrobial peptides bacteriocin is growing rapidly, cutting across various fields including; food, pharmaceutical, medicine and industrial technology. More than 2000 documents related to bacteriocins and anti-microbial peptides have been published in the last 20 years, with about 1741 of these being research articles in the English language. The present study observed a doubling in the research output per year compared to those in the earlier years. This shows that the research field is growing. The United States, Spain and The People's Republic of China are the leading nations in bacteriocin research output. The bibliometric analysis performed in this study enabled the identification of institutes and authors with the highest research output and showed inter-institute, country and regional collaboration in bacteriocin research. The review further highlighted trends in bacteriocin research, pointing out that bacteriocin research is focused mainly on biotechnology and food safety, with numerous publications on the application of these antimicrobial peptides in food preservation. It is expected that this is the direction the field may take in the coming years.


LAB = Lactic Acid Bacteria
WoS = Web of Science


Conceptualization and Design, H.O., T.M. and C.K.A. methodology, C.K.A.; software and Analysis O.O. and C.K.A; writing—original draft preparation, C.K.A.; writing—review and editing, C.K.A, AH and U.A.E.; visualization, C.K.A. and O.O.; project administration, H.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Not applicable.


No funding was received to assist with preparing this manuscript.


The authors declare no conflict of interest.


Declared none.


Arias CA, Murray BE. Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century--A clinical super-challenge. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(5): 439-43.
Yu H, Neal JA, Sirsat SA. Consumers’ food safety risk perceptions and willingness to pay for fresh-cut produce with lower risk of foodborne illness. Food Control 2018; 86: 83-9.
Deegan LH, Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross P. Bacteriocins: Biological tools for bio-preservation and shelf-life extension. Int Dairy J 2006; 16(9): 1058-71.
Yang SC, Lin CH, Sung CT, Fang JY. Antibacterial activities of bacteriocins: Application in foods and pharmaceuticals. Front Microbiol 2014; 5: 241.
Gautam N, Sharma N. Bacteriocin: Safest approach to preserve food products. Indian J Microbiol 2009; 49(3): 204-11.
Riley MA, Wertz JE. Bacteriocins: Evolution, ecology, and application. Annu Rev Microbiol 2002; 56(1): 117-37.
Preciado GM, Michel MM, Villarreal-Morales SL, et al. Bacteriocins and its use for multidrug-resistant bacteria control 2016; 329-49.
Mojgani N, Amirnia C. Kinetics of Growth and Bacteriocin Production in L. casei RN 78 Isolated from a Dairy Sample in IR Iran. International Journal of Dairy Science 2007; 2: 1-12.
Chandrakasan G, Rodríguez-Hernández AI, del Rocío López-Cuellar M, Palma-Rodríguez HM, Chavarría-Hernández N. Bacteriocin encapsulation for food and pharmaceutical applications: Advances in the past 20 years. Biotechnol Lett 2019; 41(4-5): 453-69.
Mills S, Serrano LM, Griffin C, et al. Inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 against Listeria innocua when used as an adjunct starter in the manufacture of cheese. Microb Cell Fact 2011; 10(S1)(Suppl. 1): S7.
de Jesus Pimentel-Filho N, Mantovani HC, Diez-Gonzalez F, Vanetti MCD. Inhibition of Listeria and Staphylococcus aureus by bovicin HC5 and nisin combination in milk. J Agric Sci 2013; 8: 188.
Paul Ross R, Morgan S, Hill C. Preservation and fermentation: past, present and future. Int J Food Microbiol 2002; 79(1-2): 3-16.
Malhotra B, Keshwani A, Kharkwal H. Antimicrobial food packaging: potential and pitfalls. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 611.
Daw MA, Falkiner FR. Bacteriocins: nature, function and structure. Micron 1996; 27(6): 467-79.
Ogunbanwo ST, Sanni AI, Onilude AA. Characterication of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum F1 and Lactobacillus brevis OG1. Afr J Biotechnol 2003; 2: 219-27.
Ghrairi T, Chaftar N, Hani K. Bacteriocins: recent advances and opportunities 2012; 485-511.
López-Cuellar MR, Rodríguez-Hernández AI, Chavarría-Hernández N. LAB bacteriocin applications in the last decade. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2016; 30(6): 1039-50.
Mao G, Zou H, Chen G, Du H, Zuo J. Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 52: 1823-33.
Dong J, Chi Y, Zou D, Fu C, Huang Q, Ni M. Energy–environment–economy assessment of waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: Model development and case study. Appl Energy 2014; 114: 400-8.
Zhou F, Guo HC, Ho YS, Wu CZ. Scientometric analysis of geostatistics using multivariate methods. Scientometrics 2007; 73(3): 265-79.
Zhang W, Yuan H. A bibliometric analysis of energy performance contracting research from 2008 to 2018. Sustainability (Basel) 2019; 11(13): 3548.
Kolle SR, Shankarappa TH. Publication trends in food-borne disease research (1991–2015): A web of science core collection based analysis. J Agric Food Inf 2017; 18(1): 53-63.
Vergidis PI, Karavasiou AI, Paraschakis K, Bliziotis IA, Falagas ME. Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 24(5): 342-6.
Raloff J. Staging germ warfare in foods: science harnesses bacteria to fend off food poisoning and spoilage. Sci News 1998; 153(6): 89-90.
Šubelj L, Fiala D, Bajec M. Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases. Sci Rep 2015; 4(1): 6496.
Zyoud SH, Waring WS, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Global cocaine intoxication research trends during 1975–2015: a bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2017; 12(1): 6.
Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2016; 106(1): 213-28.
Archambault É, Vignola-Gagné É, Côté G, Larivière V, Gingrasb Y. Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics 2006; 68(3): 329-42.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010; 84(2): 523-38.
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a request from the Commission related to The use of nisin (E 234) as a food additive. EFSA J 2006; 314: 1-16.
Mellata M. Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2013; 10(11): 916-32.
Balciunas EM, Castillo Martinez FA, Todorov SD, Franco BDGM, Converti A, Oliveira RPS. Novel biotechnological applications of bacteriocins: A review. Food Control 2013; 32(1): 134-42.
Suda S, Westerbeek A, O’Connor PM, Ross RP, Hill C, Cotter PD. Effect of bioengineering lacticin 3147 lanthionine bridges on specific activity and resistance to heat and proteases. Chem Biol 2010; 17(10): 1151-60.
Collins BCP, Hill C, Ross RP. Application of lactic acid bacteria-produced bacteriocins.2010.
Leverentz B, Conway WS, Camp MJ, et al. Biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut produce by treatment with lytic bacteriophages and a bacteriocin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69(8): 4519-26.
Cintas LM, Casaus P, Herranz C, et al. Biochemical and genetic evidence that Enterococcus faecium L50 produces enterocins L50A and L50B, the sec-dependent enterocin P, and a novel bacteriocin secreted without an N-terminal extension termed enterocin Q. J Bacteriol 2000; 182(23): 6806-14.
Li C, Bai J, Cai Z, Ouyang F. Optimization of a cultural medium for bacteriocin production by Lactococcus lactis using response surface methodology. J Biotechnol 2002; 93(1): 27-34.
Pattnaik P, Kaushik JK, Grover S, Batish VK. Purification and characterization of a bacteriocin-like compound (Lichenin) produced anaerobically by Bacillus licheniformis isolated from water buffalo. J Appl Microbiol 2001; 91(4): 636-45.
Bizani D, Brandelli A. Characterization of a bacteriocin produced by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. Strain 8 A. J Appl Microbiol 2002; 93(3): 512-9.
Fujita K, Ichimasa S, Zendo T, et al. Structural analysis and characterization of lacticin Q, a novel bacteriocin belonging to a new family of unmodified bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007; 73(9): 2871-7.
Atrih A, Rekhif N, Moir AJG, Lebrihi A, Lefebvre G. Mode of action, purification and amino acid sequence of plantaricin C19, an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum C19. Int J Food Microbiol 2001; 68(1-2): 93-104.
Cheigh CI, Choi HJ, Park H, et al. Influence of growth conditions on the production of a nisin-like bacteriocin by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis A164 isolated from kimchi. J Biotechnol 2002; 95(3): 225-35.
Aasen IM, Møretrø T, Katla T, Axelsson L, Storrø I. Influence of complex nutrients, temperature and pH on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus sakei CCUG 42687. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2000; 53(2): 159-66.
Rea MC, Sit CS, Clayton E, et al. Thuricin CD, a posttranslationally modified bacteriocin with a narrow spectrum of activity against Clostridium difficile. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107(20): 9352-7.
Messi P, Bondi M, Sabia C, Battini R, Manicardi G. Detection and preliminary characterization of a bacteriocin (plantaricin 35d) produced by a Lactobacillus plantarum strain. Int J Food Microbiol 2001; 64(1-2): 193-8.
Holo H, Jeknic Z, Daeschel M, Stevanovic S, Nes IF. Plantaricin W from Lactobacillus plantarum belongs to a new family of two-peptide lantibiotics. Microbiology-(UK) 2001; 147: 643-51.
Callewaert R, Hugas M, Vuyst LD. Competitiveness and bacteriocin production of Enterococci in the production of Spanish-style dry fermented sausages. Int J Food Microbiol 2000; 57(1-2): 33-42.
Corr SC, Li Y, Riedel CU, O’Toole PW, Hill C, Gahan CGM. Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the antiinfective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104(18): 7617-21.
Todorov SD, Dicks LMT. Screening for bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria from boza, a traditional cereal beverage from Bulgaria. Process Biochem 2006; 41(1): 11-9.
Gómez-Ríos D, Ramírez-Malule H. Bibliometric analysis of recent research on multidrug and antibiotics resistance (2017–2018). J Appl Pharm Sci 2019; 9(5): 112-6.
Shin JM, Gwak JW, Kamarajan P, Fenno JC, Rickard AH, Kapila YL. Biomedical applications of nisin. J Appl Microbiol 2016; 120(6): 1449-65.
Commission E. EFSA Commission Regulation (EU) No 1129/2011 of 11 November 2011 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a Union list of food additives 2011.
Man JP, Weinkauf JG, Tsang M, Sin JHDD. Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol 2003; 19(8): 811-7.
Mora L, Deakin M, Reid A. Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2019; 142: 56-69.
Quereda JJ, Meza-Torres J, Cossart P, Pizarro-Cerda J, Listeriolysin S. A bacteriocin from epidemic&IT Listeria monocytogenes&IT strains that targets the gut microbiota. Gut Microbes 2017; 8: 384-91.
Olaimat AN, Al-Holy MA, Shahbaz HM, et al. Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in Listeria monocytogenes Isolated from Food Products: A Comprehensive Review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2018; 17(5): 1277-92.
Todorov SD. Bacteriocins from Lactobacillus plantarum production, genetic organization and mode of action: produção, organização genética e modo de ação. Braz J Microbiol 2009; 40(2): 209-21.
Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006; 295(1): 90-3.
Dadrasnia A, Shahsavari N, Salmah I. The top 101 cited articles in environmental clean-up: Oil spill remediation. Glob NEST J 2015; 17(4): 692-700.
Flynn S, van Sinderen D, Thornton GM, Holo H, Nes IF, Collins JK. Characterization of the genetic locus responsible for the production of ABP-118, a novel bacteriocin produced by the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus salivarius subsp salivarius UCC118. Microbiology-(UK) 2002; 148: 973-84.
van der Ploeg JR. Regulation of bacteriocin production in Streptococcus mutans by the quorum-sensing system required for development of genetic competence. J Bacteriol 2005; 187(12): 3980-9.
Stern NJ, Svetoch EA, Eruslanov BV, et al. Isolation of a Lactobacillus salivarius strain and purification of its bacteriocin, which is inhibitory to Campylobacter jejuni in the chicken gastrointestinal system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50(9): 3111-6.
Kommineni S, Bretl DJ, Lam V, et al. Bacteriocin production augments niche competition by enterococci in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract. Nature 2015; 526(7575): 719-22.
Aranha C, Gupta S, Reddy KVR. Contraceptive efficacy of antimicrobial peptide Nisin: in vitro and in vivo studies. Contraception 2004; 69(4): 333-8.
Kaur B, Balgir PP, Mittu B, Kumar B, Garg N. Biomedical applications of fermenticin HV6b isolated from Lactobacillus fermentum HV6b MTCC10770. BioMed research international 2013.
Dicks LMT, Dreyer L, Smith C, van Staden AD. A review: the fate of bacteriocins in the human gastro-intestinal tract: do they cross the gut–blood barrier? Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 2297.
Badaoui Najjar M, Kashtanov D, Chikindas ML. Natural antimicrobials ε-poly-l-lysine and Nisin A for control of oral microflora. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2009; 1(2): 143-7.
Kamarajan P, Hayami T, Matte B, et al. Nisin ZP, a bacteriocin and food preservative, inhibits head and neck cancer tumorigenesis and prolongs survival. PLoS One 2015; 10(7): e0131008.
Maresca D, De Prisco A, La Storia A, Cirillo T, Esposito F, Mauriello G. Microencapsulation of nisin in alginate beads by vibrating technology: Preliminary investigation. Lebensm Wiss Technol 2016; 66: 436-43.