In silico Analysis of Toxoplasma gondii Surface and Secretory Proteins for the Design of a Novel Chimeric Vaccine

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

In silico Analysis of Toxoplasma gondii Surface and Secretory Proteins for the Design of a Novel Chimeric Vaccine

The Open Microbiology Journal 15 Oct 2025 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118742858411659251007070159

Abstract

Background

This study focuses on the Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) antigens ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13, which play key roles in pathogenesis, immune evasion, and host invasion. The aim was to design a novel chimeric antigen combining these proteins as a potential vaccine candidate against T. gondii.

Methods

Fragments of ROP18 (Q101–E300), SAG1 (P61–G160), and MIC13 (D171–R320) were linked using a rigid A(EAAAK)A linker. Bioinformatics analyses predicted various properties of the chimeric protein RSM1, including transmembrane domains, B- and T-cell epitopes, secondary and tertiary structures, antigenicity, physicochemical traits, codon optimization, and mRNA structure.

Results

RSM1 consists of 485 amino acids and has an antigenicity score of 0.6694. The aliphatic index, instability index, and GRAVY score were 68.66, 54.19, and –0.639, respectively. Structural predictions supported RSM1’s potential as a vaccine candidate. The most stable tertiary structure had a ΔG of –524.80 kcal/mol, with no stable hairpins or pseudoknots at the mRNA 5′ end, suggesting favorable translation.

Discussion

The bioinformatics analyses indicate that RSM1 possesses favorable antigenic and structural properties, supporting its potential as a multi-epitope vaccine candidate. Its predicted stability and translation efficiency suggest practical viability, although the moderate instability index points to the need for further optimization.

Conclusion

RSM1 represents a promising in silico-designed vaccine candidate against T. gondii. This study lays the groundwork for subsequent experimental evaluations to determine its immunogenicity and protective efficacy in vivo.

Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii, In silico, ROP18, SAG1, MIC13.

1. INTRODUCTION

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is an obligate intracellular zoonotic parasite reported in a variety of warm-blooded and even cold-blooded animals [1-7]. This protozoan is recognized as a significant food-borne parasite capable of infecting humans through the consumption of contaminated drinking water or raw/unwashed vegetables harboring mature oocysts, as well as through the intake of undercooked or raw meats carrying tissue cysts [8, 9].

The parasite’s life cycle comprises three stages: tachyzoite, bradyzoite, and sporozoite [10]. Tachyzoites are responsible for the acute phase, while bradyzoites cause the chronic phase of the disease [11]. Toxoplasmosis usually remains asymptomatic in immunocompetent individuals. However, in immunocompromised patients, chronic infection can reactivate, potentially resulting in severe conditions such as toxoplasmic encephalitis, which can be fatal [12]. In addition, pregnant women face risks associated with this infection, including miscarriages, congenital defects, and chorioretinitis [13, 14].

Despite recent significant advances in the biology of T. gondii, the treatment of toxoplasmosis is still limited to controlling the tachyzoite stage, and current drugs cannot eliminate the parasitic cyst [15]. Chemotherapeutic options for T. gondii infection are limited. The two major drugs that are used in the treatment of acute toxoplasmosis are pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine, which are not enough when they are used alone [15]. Additionally, these drugs have various side effects [16]. Therefore, the development of a peptide-based vaccine using epitopes that stimulate humoral and cellular immune responses against Toxoplasma is necessary to control the infection. For this purpose, parasite antigens with high immunogenicity are targeted [17]. Among T. gondii antigens, Surface Antigens (SAGs), Rhoptry Proteins (ROPs), Microneme Proteins (MICs), and dense Granule Proteins (GRAs) are considered potential antigenic targets [18]. Given the complexity of the life cycle, diversity, and variability of intracellular parasite antigens such as T. gondii, vaccination should stimulate the immune system against multiple antigens [19]. MIC13 protein is crucial for the parasite’s dissemination within the host [20]. Additionally, ROP18, a secretory antigen expressed exclusively during the tachyzoite stage, plays a vital role in parasite pathogenesis [21]. Meanwhile, SAG1 is a major surface antigen found exclusively in the tachyzoite phase, contributing to immune evasion and attenuation of virulence [22]. Consequently, this study focuses on designing a vaccine candidate against T. gondii by utilizing T-cell and B-cell epitopes derived from the antigens ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13 using in silico approaches.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Sequence Retrieval

In 2024, amino acid sequences for ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13 from the T. gondii RH strain were sourced from the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) (http://www. uniprot.org/) in FASTA format. Among the available sequences, the longest sequence was selected for each antigen (ROP18 [UniProt: Q2PAY2], SAG1 [UniProt: C7E5T3], and MIC13 [UniProt: H9BC62]). These sequences were utilized for subsequent computational analyses.

2.2. Prediction of Transmembrane Domains and the Signal Peptides

The transmembrane topology of the selected proteins was assessed using the TMHMM server, which employs a Hidden Markov Model approach [23]. Both the UniProt and SignalP servers were used to evaluate the presence of signal peptides within the proteins [24].

2.3. B-cell Epitope Prediction

B-cell epitopes were predicted using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB). This server considers several parameters to increase prediction accuracy, including linear epitope prediction [25], β-turn prediction [26], flexibility [27], antigenicity [28], hydrophilicity [29], and surface accessibility [30].

2.4. MHC-I and MHC-II Epitopes

To identify potential epitopes that bind to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, antigen sequences were analyzed using the IEDB server, with a focus on the BALB/c mouse strain alleles. Following IEDB guidelines, peptides of 9 amino acids in length were preferred, and epitopes were ranked based on their predictive scores, ranging from 0 to 10 [31].

2.5. Fusion Peptide Design

For the design of a chimeric protein antigen, immunogenic epitopes derived from ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13 were strategically linked via a helical structure containing the A(EAAAK)A motif, which promotes an optimal spatial arrangement of the epitopes [32]. The A(EAAAK)A motif is an empirical rigid linker that maintains proper spacing between domains [24].

2.6. Prediction of Secondary and Tertiary Structures

The Garnier-Osguthorpe-Robson (GOR) IV (https://npsa- prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page= npsa_gor4.html) method was employed to predict the secondary structures, assessing the probabilities of α-helices, β-sheets, and random coils [33]. The ITASSER server (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER) was utilized to generate three-dimensional (3D) conformations of the sequences, resulting in confidence scores known as C-scores [24, 34]. This server predicts protein structure and function. The confidence score (C-score), one of the most important outputs of the server, estimates the accuracy and quality of the predicted models [34]. Additional 3D models of the protein sequences were produced using the Molegro Molecular Viewer software, facilitated through SWISS-MODEL [35].

2.7. Surveying Validation of the Tertiary Structure

The validity of the predicted 3D structure of the RSM1 protein was confirmed using the Ramachandran plot generator included in the SWISS-MODEL program to assess stereochemical quality (https://swissmodel.expasy. org/assess) [33]. This tool visualizes energetically favored regions of backbone dihedral angles relative to amino acid residues in a protein structure [33].

2.8. Antigenicity, Allergenicity, and Solubility Evaluation

The antigenicity of various antigen fragment configurations was analyzed using VaxiJen v.2.0 (http://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/vaxijen/VaxiJen/VaxiJen.html), where a score above 0.5 indicates potential antigenic properties, reflecting a server accuracy of between 70% and 89% depending on the target organism [36]. Allergenicity was evaluated through the Algpred server (http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/algpred/), which offers predictions with approximately 85% accuracy at a threshold of –0.4 [37]. Additionally, protein solubility propensity was estimated using the SOLpro web server (http://scratch.proteomics.ics.uci.edu/), particularly for expression in Escherichia coli (E. coli) [37].

2.9. Prediction of Physical and Chemical Properties

Physicochemical properties of the chimeric protein were predicted using the ProtParam server (http://web.expasy. org/protparam/), which predicts a set of protein features including the Molecular Weight (MW), isoelectric point, total number of positively and negatively charged residues, estimated half-life, extinction coefficient, aliphatic index, instability index, Grand Average of hydropathicity (GRAVY), and other physical and chemical properties [33].

2.10. Optimization of the Chimeric Gene

To enhance protein expression efficiency, codon optimization techniques were applied in this study, utilizing the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/emboss_backtranseq/) for reverse translation and codon optimization [24, 38].

2.11. mRNA Structure Prediction

The mfold tool (http://unafold.rna.albany.edu/?q=mfold) was utilized to evaluate the free energy of the 5′ ends of the mRNA derived from the recombinant gene, providing insights into the thermodynamic stability of the mRNA molecule [24].

3. RESULTS

3.1. Information about Genes

The investigation identified the most complete sequences for the ROP18 (UniProt: Q2PAY2), SAG1 (UniProt: C7E5T3), and MIC13 (UniProt: H9BC62) antigens, selected based on their substantial lengths of 554, 336, and 468 amino acids, respectively.

3.2. Prediction of Transmembrane Domains and the Signal Peptides

Using the TMHMM server, none of the selected antigens (ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13) were found to contain transmembrane domains. This finding highlights the importance of exposed epitopes on cell surfaces for effective immunogenicity and informs the design of chimeric antigens to exclude transmembrane domains. The SignalP 4.1 server identified potential signal peptide regions at positions 1–47 for ROP18, 1–25 for SAG1, and 1–22 for MIC13.

3.3. B-cell and T-cell Epitope Prediction

Initially, T cell epitopes of ROP18, MIC13, and SAG1 antigens were predicted separately. To assess the affinity of these epitopes for MHC class I (H2-Kd, H2-Ld, H2-Dd) and class II (I-Ad, I-Ed) alleles specific to the BALB/c mouse strain, the antigen sequences were submitted to the IEDB web server. The server predicts peptides of 9 amino acids in length, assigning scores ranging from 0 to 10. For each antigen, the fragment with the highest score was selected. Subsequently, B-cell epitopes were selected using IEDB data, considering factors such as accessibility, hydrophilicity, antigenicity, flexibility, linear epitope prediction, and beta-turn propensity. Considering that Th1-type responses are more critical than Th2 responses in infections with intracellular parasites such as Toxoplasma, a 170-amino-acid fragment of each antigen containing multiple strong B- and T-cell epitopes, with preference given to strong T-cell epitopes, was selected as the final epitope. Epitopes were chosen from the initial candidate pool based on the following criteria: highest binding affinity scores to MHC alleles (score > 9), overlap between B- and T-cell epitope-rich regions, surface accessibility, antigenicity, hydrophilicity, flexibility, and distribution across different protein domains to maximize immune coverage. Tables 1 and 2 present the predicted B- and T-cell epitopes identified through analyses using various servers.

3.4. Segment Selection

Segments of the ROP18 (Q101-E300), SAG1 (P61-G160), and MIC13 (D171-R320) proteins were strategically selected for the construction of a chimeric antigen. The lengths of these segments were 200, 100, and 150 amino acids, respectively.

Table 1.
Predicted linear B-cell epitopes of ROP18 (101-300), SAG1 (61-160), and MIC13 (171-320) antigens using the IEDB server.
B-cell Parameters ROP18 SAG1 MIC13
Bepipred Linear Epitope 20-110, 125-140, 180-220, 240-340, 355-410, 515-550 20-80, 80-145, 145-245, 245-300, 300-330 70-95, 172-185, 208-222, 240-260, 305-320, 330-405, 417-445
Beta-Turn 40-145, 165-265, 285-380, 400-520 45-65, 90-115, 125-140, 160-170, 180-265, 285-295, 305-315 60-90, 105-133, 150-165, 200-220, 305-320, 330-345, 395-405, 420-445
Accessibility 50-190, 220-320, 445-550 60-100, 120-155, 165-210, 220-295 175-200, 218-235, 270-278, 285-318, 360-381
Flexibility 40-340, 370-450, 480-550 60-115, 120-170, 190-290, 305-315 70-97, 175-185, 205-245, 255-278, 305-318, 360-380, 400-410, 420-445
Antigenicity 20-40, 60-155, 190-285, 300-420, 470-540 25-120, 140-220, 280-300, 310-336 100-130, 150-170, 235-270, 280-305, 330-345, 440-453
Hydrophilicity 40-145, 165-340, 360-460, 480-550 55-115, 125-140, 160-240, 250-320 70-95, 173-185, 207-222, 240-260, 305-320, 330-345, 395-407, 415-445
Table 2.
T-cell epitopes predicted from the IEDB server.
Protein Amino Acid Start Position1 - - Number of Binding Epitopes2 Total3
Name H2-Kd H2-Ld H2-Dd I-Ad I-Ed MHC- I MHC- II
ROP18 115, 153, 204 -- 164, 172, 196, 213, 233, 250, 255, 259, 261, 287 101, 132, 142, 147, 153, 177, 201, 225, 227, 237, 239, 250, 251, 267, 277, 279, 292, 294 110, 115, 116, 120, 122, 123,145, 151, 154, 156, 160, 161, 162, 163, 166, 170, 173, 199, 230, 239, 242, 278 13 40 53
SAG1 79 -- 93, 109,139,149 62, 66, 68, 77, 90, 96, 109, 112, 119, 138, 140, 156 73, 78, 96, 110, 142, 157 5 18 23
MIC13 -- -- 190, 222, 228, 229, 308 182, 195, 200, 222, 227, 234, 237, 244, 248, 257, 265, 271, 284, 299 173, 183, 184, 185, 186, 193, 198, 297, 298, 300, 302, 303, 319 5 27 32
Note: 1: Epitopes with a score higher than 9. 2: The number of epitopes with a score higher than 9 that bind to MHC-I and MHC-II in ROP18 (101-300), SAG1 (61-160), and MIC13 (171-320) antigens. 3: Total number of epitopes with a score higher than 9 in ROP18 (101-300), SAG1 (61-160), and MIC13 (171-320) antigens.

3.5. Prediction and Analysis of Secondary and Tertiary Structures

Analysis of the secondary structure of the composite protein RSM1, composed of 485 amino acids, revealed a secondary structure comprising 36.08% alpha-helix, 49.69% random coil, and 14.23% extended strand (Fig. 1A and B). The three-dimensional model is shown in Fig. (2A and B), with a C-score of –2.00, indicating moderate model quality.

Fig. (1).

(A). Prediction of the secondary structure of RSM1 by GOR IV online service (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_gor4.html). h=helix, e=extended strand, and c=coil, and (B) Graphical results for secondary structure prediction of RSM1 protein by GOR IV.

Fig. (2).

(A) Prediction of the tertiary structure of RSM1 using I-TASSER service (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER) (ROP18: red, SAG1: yellow, MIC13: green, and linker: white) and (B) 3D model by the SWISS-MODEL server (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/assess)

3.6. Tertiary Structure Validation

The validation of the tertiary structure was performed using the Ramachandran plot, which showed that 91.46% of the residues were situated in the favored regions, 4.52% in allowed regions, and 4.02% were identified as outliers (Fig. 3).

Fig. (3).

Validation of the tertiary structure of RSM1 protein using Ramachandran plot (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/assess). The analysis of Ramachandran plot statistics for the initial model revealed that 91.46% of amino acid residues from the structure modeled by SWISS-MODEL were incorporated in the favored regions; whereas only 4.52% and 4.02% are in allowed and outlier regions of the plot, respectively.

Fig. (4).

The prediction of the secondary structure of mRNA using mFold (http://unafold.rna.albany.edu/?q=mfold). The predicted structure lacks a hairpin and pseudo-knot at the 5′ site of the mRNA.

3.7. Antigenicity, Allergenicity, and Solubility Assessment

None of the chimeric proteins were predicted to be allergenic based on allergenicity assessments. Antigenicity scores were calculated as follows: 0.6717 for MRS1, 0.6785 for RMS1, 0.6694 for RSM1, 0.6713 for MRS2, 0.6779 for RMS2, and 0.6690 for RSM2. The solubility of the fusion protein was estimated at 0.581, indicating favorable characteristics for further development.

3.8. Prediction of Physicochemical Properties

The RSM1 protein had an isoelectric point of 9.35 and a MW of 53.81 kDa. The protein contained 57 negatively charged residues (Asp + Glu) and 75 positively charged residues (Arg + Lys). The half-life of RSM1 was approximately 30 hours in mammalian reticulocytes and extended beyond 20 hours in yeast and 10 hours in E. coli. Based on its instability index of 54.19, RSM1 was classified as unstable. Its GRAVY value was –0.639, and its aliphatic index was 68.66.

3.9. Optimization of the Codon

To enhance protein expression levels in E. coli, reverse translation was executed via the EBI server for codon optimization, ensuring that codons were optimized for the target organism to maximize expression efficiency.

3.10. Prediction of mRNA Secondary Structure

The mfold server was used to predict the optimal secondary structure of the mRNA, revealing a ΔG of –524.80 kcal/mol. The Minimum Free Energy (MFE) for the first 10 nucleotides at the 5′ end was –1.30 kcal/mol, suggesting that the formation of stable pseudoknot and hairpin structures is unlikely (Fig. 4).

4. DISCUSSION

The first step in successful vaccine development is antigen recognition, followed by identification of the parasite’s immunodominant epitopes [39]. T. gondii expresses a wide variety of antigenic epitopes, and antigen presentation varies among individuals. To address this complexity, recent vaccine development increasingly relies on in silico approaches that use bioinformatics tools to predict and select highly immunogenic epitopes. These computational methods enable the identification of epitope-rich regions across antigens, enabling more targeted vaccine design [40]. These methods can significantly reduce the time and cost of experimental testing [41]. In the in silico method, any antigen can be considered a vaccine candidate; however, our selection strategy prioritized antigenic diversity by including both surface (e.g., SAGs) and secretory (e.g., MICs, ROPs) antigens. Vaccines designed to elicit responses against multiple antigens typically offer broader protection compared to those based on a single antigen, which often lack sufficient cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes and fail to induce sterile immunity in acute or chronic toxoplasmosis [42-44]. Additionally, we selected antigens expressed across all three life stages of the parasite to ensure a more comprehensive immune response, as stage-specific antigens tend to provide limited protection [45]. T. gondii invades host cells through contact, gliding motility, moving junction formation, and Parasitophorous Vacuole (PV) development [46-48]. SAGs of T. gondii are integrated within the plasma membrane via glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors [49]. The MIC proteins are then released and spread over the parasite surface. These proteins are involved in the recognition and binding to host cell surfaces. Furthermore, the synergy and interaction between rhoptry neck and MIC proteins in the host plasma membrane stimulate gliding motility and formation of the moving junction [50-54]. Following MJ formation, the parasite invades the host cell, forms a PV, and secretes ROPs, which are critical for PV development and host cell manipulation [55-57]. The mechanism of action of each of these antigens, ROPs, MICs, and SAGs, highlights their collective role in host cell invasion and underscores their contribution to T. gondii virulENCE. Previous studies have utilized various T. gondii antigens, individually or in combination, to develop DNA- or protein-based vaccines [53, 58-61]. For example, Lin et al. employed a recombinant canine adenovirus (CAV-2) expressing the ROP18 gene, which induced strong Th1-skewed humoral and cellular responses in mice [61]. Petersen et al. reported that intramuscular vaccination with recombinant SAG1 plus alum triggered a Th2-biased response and resulted in limited survival [58]. Nabi et al. demonstrated enhanced antibody responses in mice immunized intranasally with rROP18-loaded nanospheres compared to other delivery methods [60]. Wang et al. found that a combined SAG1-MIC4 antigen provided greater protection than either antigen alone [53]. Additionally, multicomponent vaccines such as MIC1-4 and MIC1-4-6 elicited stronger immune responses, reduced brain parasite loads, and improved survival rates in mice [59]. In another study, a bioinformatics evaluation of the RMS protein, comprising MIC13, GRA1, and SAG1 antigens, suggested that this antigen could be a promising candidate for the development of a protective vaccine against T. gondii [62]. These findings underscore the superior efficacy of multigene vaccines over single-antigen approaches for toxoplasmosis prevention. Sequence conservation analyses further revealed that these antigens possess highly conserved regions across different T. gondii strains, supporting their potential as broad-spectrum vaccine targets. SAG1, for instance, is highly conserved among types I, II, and III strains, reinforcing its stability as a vaccine candidate [63]. ROP18 exhibits allele variation but retains core functional domains across strains, and its critical role in virulence suggests conserved regions are immunologically relevant [64]. MIC13, frequently included in multi-antigen vaccines alongside conserved antigens like SAG1 and ROP18, demonstrates conserved immunogenic potential [62, 65]. Together, these factors guided the prioritization of these antigens over others, aiming to maximize vaccine efficacy by targeting key molecules involved in parasite-host interactions. Based on this rationale, the current study focuses on designing a chimeric protein vaccine that contains B- and T-cell epitopes of ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13 antigens of T. gondii, and analyzing various aspects of this protein using different bioinformatics tools. A combination of three antigens (ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13) was used for the first time in the present study. On the other hand, T. gondii has a large number of antigens and antigenic epitopes. The most immunogenic epitopes of one antigen were selected using an in silico method, in combination with the most immunogenic epitopes of the other two antigens, which is a novel aspect of this study.

The study involved the construction of a chimeric protein composed of three specific antigens: ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13. During epitope selection, unstable regions and restriction sites were eliminated. CD8+ T cells that secrete interferon-γ play a crucial role in combating toxoplasmosis; however, the activation of B cells and the production of antibodies are equally vital for preventing the proliferation of the parasite within tissues during the chronic phase of the disease [66]. Therefore, in the selection of epitopes from these three antigens, epitope selection was based on the identification of fragments that are immunodominant in both B and T cells. Structurally, linkers used in multi-domain protein design are generally classified into flexible, rigid, and in vivo cleavable linkers [67]. Among these, rigid linkers are often more effective than flexible linkers for the separation of the functional domains [67]. One of the consequences of omitting a linker or using an inappropriate one is the misfolding of the chimeric protein [68], reduced protein expression [69], or the disruption of biological activity [70, 71]. In this study, the objective was to identify immunodominant fragments from these three antigens that would effectively stimulate both B and T cells. For this research, a rigid linker with the sequence A(EAAAK)nA was employed to connect the ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13 domains, with RSM1 chosen for its high antigenic potential among various configurations. This particular structure was notable for its low allergenic properties in addition to its elevated antigenicity. Antigenicity refers to the ability of a protein to be recognized by the immune system, and an adhesion found in the T. gondii proteome is likely to be antigenic. However, antigenicity alone was not sufficient to select a structure, and the tertiary structure of the protein was considered. Therefore, this structure should select final models based on the tertiary structure. I-TASSER reports up to five models that correspond to the five largest structure clusters. The C-score quantitatively measures the confidence of each model. The C-score is typically within the range of -5 to 2, where a higher C-score value signifies a model with high confidence, and vice versa. Among the modeled structures, RSM1 achieved the highest C-score, identifying it as the most suitable candidate for further investigation. The C-score is a valuable metric for evaluating the quality of predicted protein models, with higher values indicating greater confidence in the structural accuracy. In addition to this metric, structural validation was performed using a Ramachandran plot, which assesses the stereochemical quality of protein models and offers insight into their potential biological functionality [72]. RSM1 exhibited a favorable distribution of residues within the favored and allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot, with minimal representation in disallowed regions, reinforcing its classification as a high-quality model. Secondary structure analysis revealed that RSM1 consists of 36.08% alpha-helix, 14.23% extended strand, and 49.69% random coil. The presence of alpha helices and beta-turns is significant for maintaining protein stability and enhancing interactions with antibodies [73].

Additionally, when designing a vaccine, the physicochemical properties of the protein are fundamental. In this case, the aliphatic index was calculated to be 68.66, suggesting that the protein can maintain stability across a broad temperature range. However, with an instability index exceeding 40, the protein is expected to be unstable. Another important characteristic is the GRAVY score, where a negative GRAVY value suggests the protein is hydrophilic, which implies better interaction with water molecules in its environment [74]. The MW of the protein, a key factor for immune system activation, is also critical. Since an MW greater than 5 to 10 kDa is generally considered favorable for immunogenicity [33], RSM1, with its weight of 53.811 kDa, emerges as a promising antigen candidate. The isoelectric point is a key physicochemical property that plays a crucial role in assessing the solubility of proteins at specific pH levels. By determining the isoelectric point, it is possible to predict protein solubility. Typically, proteins with a pH of the solution equal to or near their isoelectric point tend to precipitate from solution [23]. Additionally, the half-life of a protein refers to the time required for half of the protein to be degraded following its synthesis within a cell. The ProtParam tool, which estimates half-life based on the N-terminal residue, may have limitations for certain analyses [24]. An important factor in codon optimization is the Codon Adaptation Index, which ranges from zero to one, and a value of one indicates that a gene uses synonymous codons for each amino acid with maximum frequency [75]. Poor codon adaptation can result in reduced or failed protein expression [24]. Additionally, mRNA stability is influenced by its MFE, as well as predictions of mRNA secondary structure, which can be performed with tools like mfold. According to mfold data, stable mRNA structures are generally more favorable for efficient translation and chimeric protein production in host systems. A primary limitation of this study is its reliance on in silico analyses based on computational predictions rather than experimental validation. While bioinformatics tools are powerful for predicting protein structures, epitopes, and antigenicity, the actual immunogenicity and biological activity of the RSM1 chimeric protein can only be confirmed through in vivo studies. B- and T-cell epitope prediction tools depend on existing databases and algorithms that may not fully capture all variables influencing immune responses; consequently, predicted epitopes might not accurately represent their immunogenic potential in biological systems. In addition, the prediction of T cell epitopes based on mouse-specific MHC alleles may limit the generalizability of the findings to other species, as immune responses can vary significantly across genetic backgrounds. To address these limitations and confirm the immunogenic potential of the designed vaccine, this study will proceed to experimental phases. The RSM1 gene will be cloned into a bacterial expression vector and expressed in E. coli. Following purification and quantification of the recombinant protein, immunization studies will be conducted in BALB/c mice. Humoral and cellular immune responses will be assessed using ELISA and cytokine profiling, while protective efficacy will be evaluated through challenge experiments and survival analyses. These steps will generate essential data regarding the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of the chimeric vaccine candidate.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study employed in silico approaches to design a novel chimeric vaccine candidate, RSM1, by incorporating immunodominant epitopes derived from the key antigens ROP18, SAG1, and MIC13 from T. gondii. In silico analysis of the RSM1 construct suggested its potential as a promising vaccine construct for the development of a protective vaccine against T. gondii. Therefore, these findings underscore the utility of bioinformatics tools in vaccine development and enable the identification of epitopes that enhance immune responses. However, the findings from in silico analysis require validation through heterologous expression and subsequent in vivo experimentation.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: T.N. conceived and designed the study protocol and served as the supervisor of this research. T.N. performed the bioinformatics analysis and drafted the manuscript. A.D., F.G., and A.M. critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

SAGs = Surface Antigens
ROPs = Rhoptry Proteins
MICs = Microneme Proteins
GRAs = Dense Granule Proteins
IEDB = Immune Epitope Database
MHC = Major Histocompatibility Complex
GOR = Garnier-Osguthorpe-Robson
3D = Three-Dimensional
C-Score = Confidence Score
MW = Molecular Weight
GRAVY = Grand Average of Hydropathicity
EBI = European Bioinformatics Institute
MFE = Minimum Free Energy

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All relevant data are available within the article.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran, for their support, cooperation, and assistance throughout the period of the study (IN&TR-403029-1403).

REFERENCES

1
Galeh TM, Sarvi S, Montazeri M, et al. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 461.
2
Hajimohammadi B, Ahmadian S, Firoozi Z, et al. A Meta-analysis of the prevalence of toxoplasmosis in livestock and poultry worldwide. EcoHealth 2022; 19(1): 55-74.
3
Bokaie S, Rahmanian V, Rahmanian K, Jahromi AS. Seroprevalence of toxoplasma gondii infection: An umbrella review of updated systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9(8): 3848-55.
4
Shariatzadeh SA, Sarvi S, Hosseini SA, et al. The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in bovines: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology 2021; 148(12): 1417-33.
5
Maspi N, Nayeri T, Moosazadeh M, Sarvi S, Sharif M, Daryani A. Global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Camelidae: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Parasitol 2021; 66(3): 733-44.
6
Ahaduzzaman M, Hasan T. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in sheep and goats from different geographical regions of the world: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Transbound Emerg Dis 2022; 69(6): 3790-822.
7
Nayeri T, Sarvi S, Daryani A. Toxoplasma gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals: A systematic review. Parasitology 2021; 148(8): 895-903.
8
Blader IJ, Saeij JP. Communication between Toxoplasma gondii and its host: Impact on parasite growth, development, immune evasion, and virulence. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl 2009; 117(5-6): 458-76.
9
Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis – A waterborne zoonosis. Vet Parasitol 2004; 126(1-2): 57-72.
10
Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Speer CA. Structures of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11(2): 267-99.
11
Pagheh AS, Daryani A, Alizadeh P, et al. Protective effect of a DNA vaccine cocktail encoding ROP13 and GRA14 with Alum nano-adjuvant against Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2021; 132: 105920.
12
Ferreira MS, Borges AS. Some aspects of protozoan infections in immunocompromised patients - A review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2002; 97(4): 443-57.
13
Piao LX, Cheng JH, Aosai F, Zhao XD, Norose K, Jin XJ. Cellular immunopathogenesis in primary Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. Parasite Immunol 2018; 40(9): e12570.
14
Sarvi S, Nayeri Chegeni T, Sharif M, et al. Congenital toxoplasmosis among Iranian neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Health 2019; 41: e2019021.
15
Konstantinovic N, Guegan H, Stäjner T, Belaz S, Robert-Gangneux F. Treatment of toxoplasmosis: Current options and future perspectives. Food Waterborne Parasitol 2019; 15: e00036.
16
Bosch-Driessen LH, Verbraak FD, Suttorp-Schulten MSA, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of pyrimethamine and azithromycin vs pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine for the treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134(1): 34-40.
17
Saeij JPJ, Boyle JP, Coller S, et al. Polymorphic secreted kinases are key virulence factors in toxoplasmosis. Science 2006; 314(5806): 1780-3.
18
Lourenço EV, Bernardes ES, Silva NM, Mineo JR, Panunto-Castelo A, Roque-Barreira MC. Immunization with MIC1 and MIC4 induces protective immunity against Toxoplasma gondii. Microbes Infect 2006; 8(5): 1244-51.
19
Liu S, Shi L, Cheng Y, Fan G, Ren H, Yuan Y. Evaluation of protective effect of multi-epitope DNA vaccine encoding six antigen segments of Toxoplasma gondii in mice. Parasitol Res 2009; 105(1): 267-74.
20
Yuan ZG, Ren D, Zhou DH, et al. Evaluation of protective effect of pVAX-TgMIC13 plasmid against acute and chronic Toxoplasma gondii infection in a murine model. Vaccine 2013; 31(31): 3135-9.
21
Qu D, Han J, Du A. Enhancement of protective immune response to recombinant Toxoplasma gondii ROP18 antigen by ginsenoside Re. Exp Parasitol 2013; 135(2): 234-9.
22
Lekutis C, Ferguson DJP, Grigg ME, Camps M, Boothroyd JC. Surface antigens of Toxoplasma gondii: variations on a theme. Int J Parasitol 2001; 31(12): 1285-92.
23
Alibakhshi A, Bandehpour M, Nafarieh T, Gheflat S, Kazemi B. In silico analysis of immunologic regions of surface antigens (SAGs) of Toxoplasma gondii. Novelty Biomed 2017; 5(3): 109-18.
24
Dodangeh S, Fasihi-Ramandi M, Daryani A, Valadan R, Sarvi S. In silico analysis and expression of a novel chimeric antigen as a vaccine candidate against Toxoplasma gondii. Microb Pathog 2019; 132: 275-81.
25
Larsen J, Lund O, Nielsen M. Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes. Immunome Res 2006; 2(1): 2.
26
Chou PY, Fasman GD. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1978; 47: 45-148.
27
Karplus PA, Schulz GE. Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins. Naturwissenschaften 1985; 72(4): 212-3.
28
Kolaskar AS, Tongaonkar PC. A semi‐empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett 1990; 276(1-2): 172-4.
29
Parker JMR, Guo D, Hodges RS. New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: Correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and x-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 1986; 25(19): 5425-32.
30
Emini EA, Hughes JV, Perlow DS, Boger J. Induction of hepatitis A virus-neutralizing antibody by a virus-specific synthetic peptide. J Virol 1985; 55(3): 836-9.
31
María R, Arturo C, Alicia JA, Paulina M, Gerardo AO. The impact of bioinformatics on vaccine design and development. Vaccines 2017; 2: 3-6.
32
Pourseif MM, Yousefpour M, Aminianfar M, Moghaddam G, Nematollahi A. A multi-method and structure-based in silico vaccine designing against Echinococcus granulosus through investigating enolase protein. Bioimpacts 2019; 9(3): 131-44.
33
Ghaffari AD, Dalimi A, Ghaffarifar F, Pirestani M. Structural predication and antigenic analysis of ROP16 protein utilizing immunoinformatics methods in order to identification of a vaccine against Toxoplasma gondii: An in silico approach. Microb Pathog 2020; 142: 104079.
34
Yang J, Zhang Y. I-TASSER server: New development for protein structure and function predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43(W1): W174-81.
35
Guex N, Peitsch MC, Schwede T. Automated comparative protein structure modeling with SWISS‐MODEL and Swiss‐PdbViewer: A historical perspective. Electrophoresis 2009; 30(S1): S162-73.
36
Doytchinova IA, Flower DR. VaxiJen: A server for prediction of protective antigens, tumour antigens and subunit vaccines. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8(1): 4.
37
Magnan CN, Randall A, Baldi P. SOLpro: Accurate sequence-based prediction of protein solubility. Bioinformatics 2009; 25(17): 2200-7.
38
Mauro VP. Codon optimization in the production of recombinant biotherapeutics: Potential risks and considerations. BioDrugs 2018; 32(1): 69-81.
39
Wang ZD, Liu HH, Ma ZX, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 389.
40
Foroutan M, Ghaffarifar F, Sharifi Z, Dalimi A, Pirestani M. Bioinformatics analysis of ROP8 protein to improve vaccine design against Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Genet Evol 2018; 62: 193-204.
41
Kazi A, Chuah C, Majeed ABA, Leow CH, Lim BH, Leow CY. Current progress of immunoinformatics approach harnessed for cellular- and antibody-dependent vaccine design. Pathog Glob Health 2018; 112(3): 123-31.
42
Nayeri T, Sarvi S, Fasihi-Ramandi M, et al. Structural prediction and antigenic analysis of ROP18, MIC4, and SAG1 proteins to improve vaccine design against Toxoplasma gondii: An in silico approach. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2025; 25(3): e18715265332103.
43
Nayeri T, Sarvi S, Fasihi-Ramandi M, et al. Enhancement of immune responses by vaccine potential of three antigens, including ROP18, MIC4, and SAG1 against acute toxoplasmosis in mice. Exp Parasitol 2023; 244: 108427.
44
Zhang NZ, Wang M, Xu Y, Petersen E, Zhu XQ. Recent advances in developing vaccines against Toxoplasma gondii: An update. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 14(12): 1609-21.
45
Fachado A, Rodriguez A, Angel SO, et al. Protective effect of a naked DNA vaccine cocktail against lethal toxoplasmosis in mice. Vaccine 2003; 21(13-14): 1327-35.
46
Dubremetz JF, Garcia-Réguet N, Conseil V, Fourmaux MN. Invited review Apical organelles and host-cell invasion by Apicomplexa. Int J Parasitol 1998; 28(7): 1007-13.
47
Ortega-Barria E, Boothroyd JC. A Toxoplasma lectin-like activity specific for sulfated polysaccharides is involved in host cell infection. J Biol Chem 1999; 274(3): 1267-76.
48
Ni T, Williams SI, Rezelj S, et al. Structures of monomeric and oligomeric forms of the Toxoplasma gondii perforin-like protein 1. Sci Adv 2018; 4(3): eaaq0762.
49
Bhopale GM. Pathogenesis of toxoplasmosis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 26(4): 213-22.
50
Dubremetz JF. Rhoptries are major players in Toxoplasma gondii invasion and host cell interaction. Cell Microbiol 2007; 9(4): 841-8.
51
Besteiro S, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M. The moving junction of apicomplexan parasites: a key structure for invasion. Cell Microbiol 2011; 13(6): 797-805.
52
Frénal K, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M, Soldati-Favre D. Gliding motility powers invasion and egress in Apicomplexa. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017; 15(11): 645-60.
53
Wang H, He S, Yao Y, et al. Toxoplasma gondii: Protective effect of an intranasal SAG1 and MIC4 DNA vaccine in mice. Exp Parasitol 2009; 122(3): 226-32.
54
Roozbehani M, Falak R, Mohammadi M, et al. Characterization of a multi-epitope peptide with selective MHC-binding capabilities encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles as a novel vaccine candidate against Toxoplasma gondii infection. Vaccine 2018; 36(41): 6124-32.
55
Boothroyd JC, Dubremetz JF. Kiss and spit: the dual roles of Toxoplasma rhoptries. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008; 6(1): 79-88.
56
Walker DM, Oghumu S, Gupta G, McGwire BS, Drew ME, Satoskar AR. Mechanisms of cellular invasion by intracellular parasites. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71(7): 1245-63.
57
Schwartzman JD. Inhibition of a penetration-enhancing factor of Toxoplasma gondii by monoclonal antibodies specific for rhoptries. Infect Immun 1986; 51(3): 760-4.
58
Petersen E, Nielsen HV, Christiansen L, Spenter J. Immunization with E. coli produced recombinant T. gondii SAG1 with alum as adjuvant protect mice against lethal infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Vaccine 1998; 16(13): 1283-9.
59
Pinzan CF, Sardinha-Silva A, Almeida F, et al. Vaccination with recombinant microneme proteins confers protection against experimental toxoplasmosis in mice. PLoS One 2015; 10(11): e0143087.
60
Nabi H, Rashid I, Ahmad N, et al. Induction of specific humoral immune response in mice immunized with ROP18 nanospheres from Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitol Res 2017; 116(1): 359-70.
61
Li XZ, Wang XH, Xia LJ, et al. Protective efficacy of recombinant canine adenovirus type-2 expressing TgROP18 (CAV-2-ROP18) against acute and chronic Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15(1): 114.
62
Hosseininejad Z, Daryani A, Fasihi-Ramandi M, et al. In silico vaccine design and expression of the multi-component protein candidate against the Toxoplasma gondii parasite from MIC13, GRA1, and SAG1 antigens. Iran J Parasitol 2023; 18(3): 301-12.
63
Pagheh AS, Sarvi S, Sharif M, et al. Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen 1 (SAG1) as a potential candidate to develop vaccine against toxoplasmosis: A systematic review. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 69: 101414.
64
Khan A, Taylor S, Ajioka JW, Rosenthal BM, Sibley LD. Selection at a single locus leads to widespread expansion of Toxoplasma gondii lineages that are virulent in mice. PLoS Genet 2009; 5(3): e1000404.
65
Wu Q, Zhang Z, Chu H, et al. A novel combined quadrivalent self-amplifying mRNA-LNP vaccine provokes protective immunity against acute and chronic toxoplasmosis in mice. Infect Dis Poverty 2025; 14(1): 55.
66
Kang H, Remington JS, Suzuki Y. Decreased resistance of B cell-deficient mice to infection with Toxoplasma gondii despite unimpaired expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and inducible nitric oxide synthase. J Immunol 2000; 164(5): 2629-34.
67
Chen X, Zaro JL, Shen WC. Fusion protein linkers: Property, design and functionality. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013; 65(10): 1357-69.
68
Zhao HL, Yao XQ, Xue C, Wang Y, Xiong XH, Liu ZM. Increasing the homogeneity, stability and activity of human serum albumin and interferon-α2b fusion protein by linker engineering. Protein Expr Purif 2008; 61(1): 73-7.
69
Amet N, Lee HF, Shen WC. Insertion of the designed helical linker led to increased expression of tf-based fusion proteins. Pharm Res 2009; 26(3): 523-8.
70
Bai Y, Ann DK, Shen WC. Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-transferrin fusion protein as an oral myelopoietic agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(20): 7292-6.
71
Bai Y, Shen WC. Improving the oral efficacy of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and transferrin fusion protein by spacer optimization. Pharm Res 2006; 23(9): 2116-21.
72
Goswami AM. Structural modeling and in silico analysis of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms of human 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2. Meta Gene 2015; 5: 162-72.
73
Shaddel M, Ebrahimi M, Tabandeh MR. Bioinformatics analysis of single and multi-hybrid epitopes of GRA-1, GRA-4, GRA-6 and GRA-7 proteins to improve DNA vaccine design against Toxoplasma gondii. J Parasit Dis 2018; 42(2): 269-76.
74
Imani-Fooladi AA, Yousefi F, Mousavi SF, Amani J. In silico design and analysis of TGFαl3-seb fusion protein as “a new antitumor agent” candidate by ligand-targeted superantigens technique. Iran J Cancer Prev 2014; 7(3): 152-64.
75
Puigbò P, Bravo IG, Garcia-Vallvé S. E-CAI: a novel server to estimate an expected value of Codon Adaptation Index (eCAI). BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9(1): 65.